"If you are silent about your pain, they'll kill you and say you enjoyed your pain"  (Zora Neale Hurston)

Trump and Musk are wanting to privatize Social Security. Then they want to sell off everything in the building. They are hoping to get their greedy hands on the $1.7 trillion in the Social Security fund.

But that money is not the Federal Government's money. Of course it belongs to all people and employers who have paid into it their whole working life.

The richest man in the world has been put in charge of dismantling American programs that were created to prevent elderly poverty. Why should he care? He will never depend on it. 

I am 71 and I need my Social Security to pay my bills. I still work 3 days a week. I didn’t save enough to retire at 62 or 66. I have read that what I have managed to save is about average for a big part of  American workers. EVERYONE WHO READS THIS SHOULD LET EVERYONE THEY KNOW WHO IS DEPENDENT ON SOCIAL SECURITY THAT THEY NEED TO ACT NOW. ALSO TELL EVERYONE YOU KNOW WHO HAS PARENTS.

@Bsendejas

 

 

Why is Elon Musk trashing the SS (Social Security) phone system?  He tried this last week and got shot down, but it’s so important to him that he’s doing it again.  And at the same time, why is he closing hundreds of social security offices across the nation?

The answer is pretty simple.

Musk has continuously, without evidence, accused social security as a ‘ponzi scheme’ and ‘rife with fraud’. 

It’s no secret that Republicans have been eyeing this ‘third rail’ for decades, without much success.

But now comes Musk with a double-whammy.

Once the social security phone system is removed, the ONLY recourse SS applicants and current recipients have is to make an appointment at their nearest Social Security office (currently at least a month wait) and come in to plead their case.  All musk has to do is to begin denying new applications or wiping people off Social Security with a message, “we need to verify that you are a US citizen and properly identify yourself.  Please bring in your SS card, a notarized birth certificate, Name change documentation for married women, and a real ID or passport so that your payments can start/resume” 

The majority of SS recipients (new and existing) depend on social security and Medicare/medicaid to survive.  A few months without these payments will wipe them out.

This is fucking evil, if this is really the plan.  Please, show me that I’m wrong in the comments.  I really don’t mind being schooled.

@MsTree

 

Paul Krugman is now posting stuff on a nearly daily basis on Substack, and well worth following:

The Clean Little Secret of Social Security -It’s a pretty good program, and we can afford it

Smears, Sadism and Social Security — Why Elon Musk wants to make seniors suffer

You’ve probably seen Musk claiming that Social Security is a Ponzi scheme and that millions of dead people are collecting benefits? Besides decimating the staff and closing offices at SSA,

The goal is, if you can’t kill Social Security, make it impossible for people to file claims or get help.

Under this plan, beneficiaries would still be able to call the SSA. But they would have to verify their identity either over the internet or through in-person visits to field offices.

Bear in mind that we’re talking about older and/or disabled Americans, many of whom are unable to access the internet and physically unable to visit SSA offices — which would in any case be overwhelmed by the increased traffic, given that the agency is already facing large staffing cuts. So this would be a move of almost cartoonish cruelty, and a nightmare for millions of Americans

Why would Musk do this? Krugman speculates:

My guess, instead, is that it’s an ego thing, that Social Security has become to Musk what Canada has become to Donald Trump. Both men at one point said something stupid, something that would have turned them into laughingstocks if there weren’t so much fear in the air. But both men have been unable to let go, doubling down in what amounts to an attempt to redeem their initial foolishness.

The Washington Post reports that employee cuts at the SSA have led to office managers at field offices being forced to answer phone calls at the front desk in place of fired receptionists. In addition, the agency’s website crashed four times in 10 days in March due to server overloads, preventing millions of retired people and the disabled from accessing their online accounts.

 

Seine Rede am Dienstag, den 4. März, auf der Besuchertribüne des Senats über die Unterstützung der Ukraine und die Haltung von Donald Trump.

Indem er ihn als „Brandkaiser“ bezeichnete und die US-Regierung kritisierte, gelang es Claude Malhuret, die Aufmerksamkeit der Medien und der sozialen Netzwerke, insbesondere in den USA, auf sich zu ziehen (während seine Rede in den amerikanischen Sendern keine Schlagzeilen machte).

 

"Europa befindet sich an einem entscheidenden Punkt seiner Geschichte. Der amerikanische Schutzschild entgleitet, die Ukraine droht aufgegeben zu werden, und Russland wird gestärkt. Washington ist zum Hofstaat Neros geworden: ein aufbrausender Kaiser, unterwürfige Höflinge und ein Possenreißer auf Ketamin, der mit der Säuberung des öffentlichen Dienstes beauftragt ist.

Dies ist eine Tragödie für die freie Welt, aber in erster Linie eine Tragödie für die Vereinigten Staaten. Die Botschaft von Donald Trump lautet, dass es sinnlos ist, sein Verbündeter zu sein, denn er wird euch nicht verteidigen, er wird euch mehr Zölle auferlegen als seinen Feinden, und er wird damit drohen, eure Territorien zu beschlagnahmen, während er die Diktatoren unterstützt, die bei euch einmarschieren.

Der König des Deals zeigt, dass die Kunst des Deals auf dem Boden der Tatsachen liegt. Er glaubt, dass er China einschüchtern kann, indem er vor dem russischen Präsidenten Wladimir Putin kapituliert, aber Chinas Präsident Xi Jinping beschleunigt angesichts dieses Scheiterns zweifellos seine Pläne für eine Invasion Taiwans.

Noch nie in der Geschichte hat ein Präsident der Vereinigten Staaten vor dem Feind kapituliert.Noch nie hat er einen Aggressor gegen einen Verbündeten unterstützt, noch nie so viele illegale Dekrete erlassen und so viele Militärs auf einen Schlag gefeuert. Noch nie hat jemand die amerikanische Verfassung so mit Füßen getreten und gleichzeitig damit gedroht, Richter, die sich ihm in den Weg stellen, zu missachten, die Gegengewalt zu schwächen und die Kontrolle über die sozialen Medien zu übernehmen. 

Das ist kein Abdriften in den Illiberalismus, das ist der Beginn der Eroberung der Demokratie. Erinnern wir uns daran, dass es nur einen Monat, drei Wochen und zwei Tage dauerte, um die Weimarer Republik und ihre Verfassung zu stürzen."

RTL

 

At the highest level of the EU, an 800 billion euro project has just been proposed to “rearm Europe”, but much of this money is likely to end up in American pockets, according to Jenny Raflik-Grenouilleau. "If Europeans want to buy weapons quickly, they're going to have to turn to those who can sell them quickly,” she warns. And I'm afraid that European sovereignty won't be strengthened at all.”

 

 

Jenny RAFLIK-GRENOUILLEAU
University Professor
University of Nantes
Professor of the History of Contemporary International Relations at Nantes University Jenny Raflik-Grenouilleau is a specialist in security and defense issues. Her publications include Une République moderne: La IVè République, 1946-1958 (Le Seuil, 2018), Terrorisme et mondialisation, approches historiques (Gallimard, 2016), La Quatrième République et l'Alliance atlantique (PUR, 2013).

 

European NATO members have become even more dependent on U.S. weapons than before, according to a report by the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI) released Monday.

European arms imports shot up by 155 percent over 2020-2024 compared with 2015-2019 — a reaction to Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine three years ago.

While the U.S. supplied 52 percent of European NATO members' military equipment between 2015 and 2019, the share rose to 64 percent in the subsequent five-year period.

.

 

 

JD Vance and Donald Trump are “Vladimir Putin’s useful idiots”, the vice-president’s cousin has claimed, after the US suspended military aid to Ukraine.

Nate Vance, the cousin of U.S. Vice President JD Vance and a volunteer fighting on Ukraine's front lines, said he is "disappointed" in his relative's stance on Ukraine.

Vance, a former U.S. Marine, defended Ukraine from 2022 to January 2025 as a member of the Da Vinci Wolves First Motorized Battalion, a volunteer unit.

"Being your family doesn't mean I'm going to accept you killing my comrades," Vance said in an interview with Le Figaro published on March 9.

Vance's remarks come at a low point in U.S.-Ukrainian relations, as Washington has halted intelligence sharing and military aid to Kyiv. The freeze followed a contentious meeting in the Oval Office between U.S. President Donald Trump, Vice President Vance, and President Volodymyr Zelensky.   

Nate Vance said he was disappointed in how his cousin treated Zelensky during the meeting.

"When (JD Vance) criticized aid to Ukraine, I thought it was because he needed to appeal to his electorate, that it was part of the political game," Vance said.

"But what they did to Zelensky was an ambush of absolute dishonesty."

The vice president's continued distrust of Zelensky is unjustified, as are his views on Ukraine, Vance said.

"I thought I was going to choke ... His own cousin was on the front lines. I could have told him the truth, without pretense, without personal interest. He never tried to find out more."

Vance said he tried to get in touch with his cousin several times with no success.

"I left messages at his office. I never heard from him," he said.

Vance volunteered to fight in Ukraine following Russia's full-scale invasion in 2022, but left shortly before the U.S. presidential inauguration out of fear of being captured by the Russian army.

"It had become complicated to stay. I couldn't take the risk of being captured," he said.

 

The billionaire, who co-chairs the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), was responding to an X post that called for US to “Exit NATO *now*!”

“We really should,” Musk said.

On March 2, Musk had responded a post on X which said,"It’s time to leave NATO and the UN".

“I agree,” the Tesla chief executive officer said.

Musk’s comments comes at a time when the future of the 32-member NATO, which will mark its 76th anniversary in April, hangs in the balance.

According to NBC, US President Donald Trump on March 6 discussed with aides calibrating US engagement with NATO in a way that favours members of the alliance that spend a certain percentage of their GDP on defense.

Hindustan Times.